[ad_1]
New Delhi:
Congress chief Anand Sharma on Sunday declared himself “amused” by Foreign Minister S Jaishankar’s defence of a “directionless foreign policy” and in addition questioned the centre’s use of the armed forces for “partisan propaganda”.
Mr Sharma’s six-tweet thread was in help of celebration MP Rahul Gandhi who, on Friday, criticised the federal government over its dealing with of international affairs. Mr Jaishankar counter-attacked hours later with examples to indicate India’s improved place in international geopolitics.
The Foreign Minister, nonetheless, did not persuade Mr Sharma, who tweeted: “Amused by Foreign Minister S Jaishankar’s defence of a directionless foreign policy. Rhetoric and tweets do not change ground reality. Neighbourhood first has been a priority of India’s foreign policy but sadly derailed by cavalier approach”.
Amused by Foreign Minister @DrSJaishankar‘s defence of a directionless international coverage. Rhetoric and tweets don’t change floor actuality. Neighbourhood first has been a precedence of India’s international coverage however sadly derailed by a cavalier method. (1/6)
— Anand Sharma (@AnandSharmaINC) July 19, 2020
The Narendra Modi authorities’s international affairs insurance policies have been criticised by the Congress, significantly within the mild of border disputes with each China and Nepal.
On Friday Mr Gandhi, mentioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “constant blunders… have basically weakened India”. The Foreign Affairs minister hit again by pointing to common conferences with the US, Russia and Japan, and mentioned “India engages China on more equal terms, politically”.
Mr Jaishankar additionally talked about Pakistan and mentioned it “… surely notes the difference between Balakot and Uri on the one hand, and Sharm-el-Sheikh, Havana and 26/11 on the other”.
The reference invited a retort from Mr Sharma, who mentioned it was “oddly out place” and that speaking about Balakot and Uri amounted to “partisan propaganda”.
Dr Jaishankar’s reference to Mumbai terror assault was oddly misplaced. As India’s Ambassador and senior diplomat, he was articulating India’s place which, for political expediency, he has chosen to criticize and disown. (3/6)
— Anand Sharma (@AnandSharmaINC) July 19, 2020
“Do I have to remind (you) that Indian Army, Airforce and Navy existed before May 2014 and their heroics and valour (are) respected globally. (The) Army belongs to the nation and fights under the tricolour. Advising in national interest. Do not politicise or monopolise our defence forces,” he mentioned.
Do I’ve to remind that Indian Army, Airforce and Navy existed earlier than May 2014 and their heroics and valour revered globally. Army belongs to the nation and fights underneath the tricolour.
Advising in nationwide curiosity. Do not politicise or monopolise our defence forces. (5/6)— Anand Sharma (@AnandSharmaINC) July 19, 2020
Mr Sharma additionally challenged S Jaishankar’s defence of relations with Nepal, writing: “India & Nepal have historically shared a relationship bases on trust, friendship, and mutual respect. The present drift and tension are a matter of national concern”.
India & Nepal have traditionally shared a relationship bases on belief, friendship, and mutual respect. The current drift and rigidity are a matter of nationwide concern. Foreign Minister can not have the luxurious of denial however ought to reply for the failures. (2/6)
— Anand Sharma (@AnandSharmaINC) July 19, 2020
Tensions between India and Nepal have escalated because the Nepal parliament handed a constitutional modification to update the country’s map and claim territory owned by India.
“Foreign policy must have gravitas and depth. Engagement with strategic partners demands seriousness… and reduced to event management. You may create illusions by your optics, but history will judge you by outcomes,” Mr Sharma signed off.
[ad_2]
Source link