[ad_1]
BJP State normal secretary Okay. Nagarajan on Saturday instructed the Madras High Court, at a particular sitting, that solely 30 persons in 15 vehicles will take part within the ‘Vetrivel Yatra’ to cowl the six abodes of Lord Murugan. Besides, the tour could be wound up a lot earlier than December 6, the Babri Masjid demolition anniversary.
Justices M. Sathyanarayanan and R. Hemalatha have been instructed by advocate Venkatachari Raghavachari that Mr. Nagarajan would make a recent illustration to the police on Sunday, itemizing out particulars of the yatra. He hoped there won’t be any additional objection in granting permission. The submission was made on the listening to of an pressing writ petition moved by the BJP chief after the police denied permission for the yatra.
On Friday, when the yatra started, individuals, together with president L. Murugan, have been detained.
During the course of listening to, the senior decide on the Bench identified that the earlier representations made by the petitioner to the police didn’t comprise any particulars relating to the variety of individuals, automobiles and folks above 60 years of age.
Also baffled at an elaborate route deliberate throughout the State, the decide requested: “If your purpose is going to the six abodes of Lord Murugan, why do you want to tour through routes where there are no Murugan temples at all.” He mentioned the litigant couldn’t be allowed to choose and select the route particularly when the specter of COVID-19 was nonetheless looming massive.
Revenue and cops had to sort out issues due to the onset of the monsoon and likewise the regulation and order scenario through the Babri Masjid demolition anniversary, the decide mentioned. The police could be ready to contemplate grant of permission for the yatra provided that all materials particulars have been submitted to them.
On her half, Justice Hemalatha puzzled why the State authorities was opposing the yatra when 1000’s of devotees have been allowed at main temples. Recalling her current go to to the Meenakshi Sundareswarar Temple in Madurai, she mentioned about 2,000 individuals had congregated there.
Advocate-General Vijay Narayan submitted that the petitioner’s counsel was making an attempt to oversimplify the problem by claiming that it was a easy go to to the temples by Mr. Murugan and that the federal government was stopping him. “It is not like that. He wants to have a huge gathering with him. Such a crowd may not be advisable when scientists are predicting a second or even a third wave of COVID-19,” he mentioned.
The Advocate-General added {that a} majority of the individuals of the yatra, which commenced on Friday with out police permission, weren’t carrying masks. “I can show videos of that,” he mentioned. Justice Sathyanarayanan mentioned the courtroom may even take cognizance of the images revealed in newspapers. He mentioned the yatra was not only a easy go to to the temples however concerned a procession.
Though the petitioner had now instructed the courtroom that solely 30 individuals in 15 vehicles would go on the yatra, there was a risk of overenthusiastic social gathering cadres and others congregating in massive numbers to welcome the individuals at district borders and on the temples, the decide mentioned. Therefore, the Bench granted time until Tuesday for the petitioner to file an extra affidavit with all needed particulars.
The judges directed Additional Solicitor-General R. Sankaranarayanan to get directions from the Centre by Tuesday on the binding nature of the rules issued by it to the State governments on tackling COVID-19. The Bench wished to know if the rules have been solely recommendatory.
The query was raised for the reason that petitioner had challenged the October 31 Revenue and Disaster Management Department order whereby it was said that non secular congregations, with a ceiling of 100 individuals, could be permitted within the State solely from November 16 and never earlier than that.
According to the petitioner, the GO was in contravention of the Union Home Ministry’s September 30 notification which allows non secular gatherings, with much more than 100 individuals, from October 15 and requires the States to lay down Standard Operating Procedures.
The State authorities was sure to comply with the Central tips so long as it had not reported to the Union Home Ministry that the situations prevailing right here required a distinct yardstick, the petitioner mentioned. He claimed {that a} nationwide social gathering couldn’t be denied permission for such an occasion when authorities and different personal capabilities have been being allowed freely.
[ad_2]
Source