[ad_1]
The possibility of dwelling exams being compromised or manipulated by members or teaching centres can not be ruled out, the Delhi High Court has mentioned whereas dismissing a plea that candidates be allowed to take Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) 2020 from their properties as an alternative of exams centres because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The courtroom mentioned the issue of accessibility for 78,000 candidates to acceptable know-how, web connection, laptop computer or desktop pc would be uncertain and the plea for dwelling exam can not be accepted.
The CLAT-2020 examination, to be held on August 22 earlier, will now be carried out on September 28.
Justice Jayant Nath mentioned it’s clear that the pleas of the petitioner are misplaced and can’t be a floor for suspending the exams or change of mode to conduct the exam.
“I may also note that the petitioner (V Govinda Ramanan) has completed his LLB in 2016. It is now after a gap of 4 years that he seeks to apply for a post graduation in law. The petitioner has hence waited for four years to give the exam. There is no merit in the present petition. The same is dismissed,” the decide mentioned.
While the order was handed on September 10, it was made accessible on the courtroom web site on Wednesday.
The petition was filed by the petitioner in search of an acceptable path to quash the CLAT- 2020 examination notification issued by the Consortium of National Law Universities (NLU) in as far as it mandates the petitioner to bodily go to the examination centre and provides the exam.
CLAT is a centralised exam for admissions to bachelors and masters programs in regulation in 22 NLUs within the nation and is carried out by the consortium.
Under the CLAT 2020 notification, the exam would be held on-line at notified centres the place computer systems would be arrange for candidates to entry the check.
The petitioner, who’s a regulation graduate and desires to pursue his LLM, mentioned he suffered from bronchial asthma and falls beneath the susceptible class of people who’re suggested by the federal government to not go outdoors within the current time of COVID-19 pandemic.
The consortium informed the courtroom that the choice to conduct CLAT-2020 at bodily check centres was challenged by manner of Public Interest Litigation earlier than the Supreme Court which has dismissed it.
The excessive courtroom mentioned, “Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is clear that the aforesaid order (of Supreme Court) would remain binding on this court.” “Even otherwise, it is clear that the plea of respondent no.1 (consortium) that a home-based exam may not be appropriate for approximately 78,000 candidates who are to take the exam. The possibility of the exams being compromised or manipulated by the participants/coaching centers cannot be ruled out.
“That apart, the problem of accessibility for 78,000 candidates to appropriate technology, internet connection, laptop or desktop computer itself would be doubtful. Hence this plea of the petitioner cannot be accepted.” the excessive courtroom mentioned.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink