[ad_1]
JNU scholar Natasha Narwal, arrested below the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, alleged earlier than a courtroom right here on Thursday that the cost sheet filed by the police in a north east Delhi riots case revolved across the deaths of solely three individuals, together with Head constable Ratan Lal and and Intelligence Bureau official Ankit Sharma, and ignored the deaths of the opposite native individuals. Her counsel Adit Pujari alleged earlier than Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat that 53 individuals died within the riots however the cost sheet revolved across the deaths of solely three individuals.
“Are we living in a society where the life of a policemen is, they are doing hard work no doubt, more important than 48 other civilians. The prosecution named 53 persons who died in the riots, yet their conspiracy chargesheet revolves around three people, Ratan Lal, Rahul Solanki and Ankit Sharma. What about the other 48 people who are locals and who died? Everything comes back to these three people. The lady who was 84 years old and who died in her house when her house was burned by the mob of other community is not important,” he claimed in the course of the listening to of Narwal’s bail software by way of video conferencing. Pujari stated that the conspiracy was not to trigger riots, however to create disaffection in opposition to India allegedly by protestors supporting the Citizenship Amendment Act. It was to create some sort of scenario which might appeal to sections of UAPA. UAPA just isn’t attracted in opposition to Narwal. She was not current on the alleged secret conspiratorial assembly at Chand Bag and her name element file confirmed it, he claimed.
He additional stated if the prosecution’s case was that they weren’t certain to present each materials with the chargesheet, then the accused has each proper to say the prosecution is mala fide. The police adopted the 300 girls that day who got here from Jahangirpuri to Jafrabad. They couldn’t have carried the acid bottles, chilli powder and many others as alleged by the police. If so the police might have arrested them then and there, he claimed. He additional stated proper earlier than the elections in Delhi in February, there was an alleged vicious marketing campaign to create communal divide and the Election Commission had given steady notices to members of a sure political get together to cease doing it. Those exact same notices have been to the members who weren’t solely aligning to a specific neighborhood and supporting CAA, he said.
He additional stated that selective studying of chats of the WhatsApp group Delhi Protest Support Group (DPSG) by the prosecution was unfair. This is an incomplete and intentionally false investigation. No prima facie case is made out in opposition to Narwal. Every case of conspiracy has accused who need to do a number of issues however in direction of the identical finish. Narwal held a secular protest. Unless the prosecution alleges that she transformed her faith, it doesn’t make any sense that she have been sitting amongst Muslim girls, being Hindu herself, and instigated them in opposition to her personal neighborhood. The alleged conspiracies don’t make sense.
If the case of the prosecution rests on DPSG, it was the bounden responsibility of the prosecution to transcript your complete chats. The case is fake, the chargesheet is fake, the narrative of the prosecution is fake, Pujari alleged. Countering the submissions, Special Public Prosecutior Amit Prasad stated the intent all through was a disruptive Chakka Jaam, with clear indication that the top outcome was violence. Narwal was introduced on to the DPSG group after she was ready to arrange the protest website at Seelampur. She was a part of the DPSG group which was controlling and monitoring all protest websites. She attended the alleged conspiratorial assembly of February 16 and February 17. The chats have clearly revealed that there was a proposal to incite violence. She was privy to the principal conspirators, the general public prosecutor alleged. Narwal’s counsel additionally commented on the bulkiness of the over 17,000-page cost sheet after his system crashed in the midst of the listening to and stated it was so heavy that it usually slowed down the pc. During the listening to, the system of prosector Amit Prasad additionally crashed and it took him couple of minutes to restart it and be part of the proceedings.
Pujari stated, This is the issue with not having a bodily copy of the chargesheet with us. The chargesheet is so heavy that it usually slows down the pc. The counsels for the accused haven’t been equipped a bodily copy of the chargesheet. The courtroom had earlier stated that in addition to the tender copy, each accused also needs to be given a tough copy. The police had challenged the order earlier than the Delhi High Court, which is pending.
Pinjra Tod (Break the Cage) was based in 2015 with an purpose to make hostels and paying visitor lodging much less restrictive for girls college students.
.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink