[ad_1]
There idea of ‘Big Three’ does not exist for new ICC chairman Greg Barclay, who firmly believes that each bilateral in addition to ICC occasions can peacefully co-exist serving to the sport’s ecosystem. The ‘Big Three’ was an idea the place India, Australia and England had been purported to earn the lion’s share of world physique’s income. In the run as much as the election, New Zealand’s Barclay mentioned a notion was created that he provides significance to bilateral cricket over “everything else” however that’s removed from the reality.
“There has been a lot of misrepresentation in the media around that (that I am in favour of bilateral cricket over world events. But the fact is, of course I am an advocate of bilateral cricket, it is the lifeblood of cricket in all countries,” Barclay mentioned in a video posted on the ICC web site.
“…Countries playing each other on a regular basis, sustained competitive relevant competition is what drives fan engagement. It is what drives the development pathways, it is a vital part of cricket. But that doesn’t mean that the world events are not as important,” mentioned the administrator from New Zealand who has additionally has BCCI’s backing.
“The ICC runs world class events. If you look at what happened with the women’s T20 all the way through the final, the ODI World Cup last year, they were amazing events,” Barclay mentioned.
“They are pinnacle events no doubt about that. I would need to say they (bilateral and global events) need to work in conjunction with each other, one can’t sit in isolation to the other. I am very conscious of the delicate ecosystem that crickets sits on.”
He additionally warned in opposition to an excessive amount of cricket. “Then you are got leagues like the IPL and Big Bash. Then you have to look at the athletes’ health, safety and wealth which is paramount. We can’t expect them to perform day in and day out through the year,” he mentioned.
“Again, we have to balance out that along with fans. At end of the day, it only works if the fans want it.”
Barclay again and again reiterated {that a} fallacious notion about his preferences have been fed within the media.
“They (the media) are a massive consideration around what we do so I would like to see those working together. I am sick hearing about the fact I am in favour of bilateral cricket over everything else. I want to see all of it work in perfect harmony,” mentioned Barclay.
Referring to recreation’s highly effective nations India, Australia and England, Barclay mentioned he does not consider within the “big three” idea.
Promoted
“There is no big three as far as I am concerned. I don’t subscribe to it at all. All members are important and should be treated equally,” he mentioned.
“I do accept concerns of members could be different … I do accept that some of those bigger counties can provide certain outcomes to the ICC along the lines of hosting and revenue so again we need to take that into account and recognise that but there is no big three,” he insisted.
Topics talked about on this article
(This story has not been edited by Newslivenation workers and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)