[ad_1]
New Delhi:
Every week after lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan was held accountable of contempt for his two tweets on Chief Justice of India SA Bobde and the Supreme Court, Mr Bhushan instantly instructed the best courtroom docket that he is “pained” that he has been “grossly misunderstood”.
“I am pained to hear that I am held guilty of contempt of court. I am pained not because of the would-be sentencing, but because I am being grossly misunderstood. I believe that an open criticism is necessary to safeguard the democracy and its values,” Mr Bhushan talked about.
“My tweets need to be seen as an attempt for working for the betterment of the institution. My tweets were a small attempt to discharge what I consider my highest duty. Apologising would also be dereliction of my duty. I do not ask for mercy. I do not appeal for magnanimity. I cheerfully submit to any punishment that court may impose,” Mr Bhusan instructed the courtroom docket.
Responding to the lawyer-activist, Justice Arun Mishra talked about: “There is a Lakshman Rekha (boundary) for everything. Why cross it? We welcome pursuing good cases in public interest but remember, this is now after conviction. And it is a serious thing. I haven’t convicted anyone of contempt in 24 years as a judge. This is my first such order.”
“Freedom of speech is not absolute to anyone, to me, to press. We have to tell everyone that this is the line. There’s no problem in being an activist but we have to say this is the line. Right or wrong, we have now found you guilty.”
The lawyer-activist had requested the best courtroom docket to defer listening to on his sentencing in contempt proceedings in the direction of him. “We can assure you that no punishment will be acted upon till your review is decided,” the best courtroom docket instructed him instantly.
However, the courtroom docket rejected his request that one different bench ought to listen to arguments on the quantum of sentence. “You are asking us to commit an act of impropriety that arguments on sentencing should be heard by other bench,” the courtroom docket talked about.
In considered one of many tweets, for which he was held accountable of contempt, Mr Bhushan had talked about “four previous Chief Justices of India played a role in destroying democracy in India in the last six years”.
The totally different accused sitting Chief Justice SA Bobde of utilizing a motorbike – he was photographed on a Harley Davidson in Nagpur closing month – with no helmet and face masks, whereas holding the courtroom docket in lockdown and denying residents their correct to justice.
Mr Bhushan in an affidavit on August three had talked about he regretted solely a “part of” what he tweeted and asserted that criticism of the best resolve “does not scandalise” the courtroom docket or lower its authority.
Last week, the courtroom docket discharged Twitter from contempt for publishing Mr Bhushan’s tweets, saying it accepts the explanation given by the microblogging website.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink