[ad_1]
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday refused to entertain a plea difficult the constitutional validity of the Epidemic Act and questioned the petitioner as to why he has not moved the excessive courtroom on the difficulty.
The high courtroom mentioned excessive courts have all the facility to strike down Central Acts, just like the Epidemic Act, and the petitioner ought to go there first.
“What kind of petition you have filed Mr Mirashi (petitioner). Don’t you have the Bombay High Court to challenge the Epidemic Act? The high court has jurisdiction to strike down the Central Act,” a bench headed by Justice D Y Chandrachud instructed petitioner H N Mirashi.
“Why can’t you go to the high court? You withdraw it from here and file in the high court,” mentioned the bench, additionally comprising Justices Indu Malhotra and Indira Banerjee.
The high courtroom noticed that the competition of the petitioner that prime courts don’t have the facility to strike down a Central Act is “totally misconceived”.
“The high court has all the powers to do this,” the bench instructed the petitioner who had raised points concerning the COVID-19 quarantine coverage of the Maharashtra authorities.
After the bench mentioned it isn’t inclined to entertain the plea, the petitioner withdrew it.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink