[ad_1]
Presidents are principally ceremonial. The prime minister is the one with energy. A PM wants a majority (relying upon nations, it may be 2/third or a easy majority) help from the parliament to run their governance. Upon the lack of help to carry the majority, the PM will get sacked.
In Nepal’s case, the PM was allegedly going to be thrown out with no-confidence/pull-out of help from the events supporting the PM and thus as a rebuttal, the PM requested the president to dissolve the parliament. The latter transfer has been contested as unconstitutional however the opposition claims in any other case.
Lastly, the PM and President are allies. President sacked the parliament upon the recommendation of the PM.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink