[ad_1]
“There are very serious questions now which only the Russian government can and must answer,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel mentioned in an announcement Wednesday.
But Navalny’s supporters at the moment are pointing the finger of blame straight at Russian President Vladimir Putin.
“In 2020, poisoning Navalny with Novichok is exactly the same as leaving an autograph at the scene of the crime,” Leonid Volkov, Navalny’s chief of employees wrote over an image of the President’s signature, in a tweet that has since been deleted.
The Kremlin’s response, to date, has been: What poisoning? Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov — who has taken pains not to refer to Navalny by title, calling him solely “the patient” — has avoided calling it a poisoning, and Russian officers have declined to launch an investigation.
Death will be fast if the best dose is administered, Mirzayanov mentioned. But even a dose that does not trigger fast demise can inflict “torturous” sickness, he added. “They will start convulsions, and stop breathing and then lose vision, and there are other problems — vomiting, everything. It’s a terrible scene.”
The UK authorities’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory at Porton Down mentioned the military-grade agent was used within the assault on Russian double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia Skripal in Salisbury.
Novichok was developed by the Soviet Union within the 1970s and ’80s. At the time of Skripal’s poisoning, UK Prime Minister Theresa May mentioned that it was “highly likely” Russia was behind the assault, partly as a result of Russia had beforehand produced the agent and was nonetheless able to doing so.
And Mirzayanov, who was additionally a former head of the technical counterintelligence division within the Soviet Union, mentioned an attacker utilizing Novichok wanted to be a “very well educated and a trained person” to make it prepared to use.
But whereas the UK authorities and the EU have expressed deep concern concerning the obvious use of Novichok, one does not count on to see main hand-wringing from the Russian authorities.
After Salisbury, Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Maria Zakharova routinely mocked May’s assertion that it was “highly likely” Russia was accountable for the Salisbury poisonings.
And after Britain produced time-stamped CCTV footage of the 2 Russian males accused of the Salisbury assault, the pair appeared in a weird tv interview with Margarita Simonyan, the top of Russia’s state-run RT community, only a day after Putin publicly recommended the boys ought to come ahead and inform their story.
It was a wierd efficiency, with the 2 males insisting they have been within the enterprise of promoting dietary dietary supplements and saying the function of their transient journey was to see Salisbury’s historic cathedral spire.
The video was one thing else: a little bit of crude propaganda meant to distract and sow doubt. RT’s Simonyan seems to have reprised her position as smoke-blower-in-chief within the case of Navalny, suggesting on Twitter — with out proof — that Navalny’s sudden and extreme sickness was attributable to low blood sugar.
Dmitry Polyanskiy, the primary deputy everlasting consultant of Russia to the UN, went on Twitter in late August to allege that claims that Navalny was poisoned have been merely a pretext to bash Russia.
But one might argue the other: That the brazenness of Navalny’s poisoning is exactly the purpose, by sending a message of impunity.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink