[ad_1]
New Delhi:
A Rouse Avenue courtroom in Delhi on Saturday adjourned to September 8 the ultimate arguments on former union minister MJ Akbar’s defamation case towards journalist Priya Ramani in reference to sexual harassment allegations made towards him.
Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vishal Pahuja adjourned the matter because the arguments remained inconclusive in the course of the listening to at present.
Senior advocate Rebecca John, who’s representing Ms Ramani, informed the courtroom {that a} true imputation made in public good will not be defamation and mentioned that Ms Ramani’s alleged defamatory tweets and the Vouge article written by her have been her reality and her case is an affirmative defence.
Ms John additionally learn the grievance filed by Mr Akbar, who had referred to as Ms Ramani’s allegations as a figment of her creativeness and fabricated non-events.
Ms Ramani was summoned within the defamation case filed by Mr Akbar. The defamation cost was framed towards her on April 10, 2019, which Ms Ramani pleaded not responsible and claimed trial.
“I pleaded not guilty and also pleaded my defence,” senior advocate John mentioned including that her defence was supported by two defence witnesses.
During the arguements, Ms John took the courtroom by means of the recordsdata pertaining to Mr Akbar’s cross examination.
Mr Akbar had filed a defamation case towards Ms Ramani for accusing him of sexual misconduct.
He had on October 17, 2018, resigned because the union minister after his identify cropped up on social media after the #MeToo marketing campaign raged on within the nation. Ms Ramani had accused Akbar of sexual misconduct, a cost denied by him.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink