[ad_1]
The courtroom will hear and resolve Bilal’s software on November 25 and can hear Purohit’s plea on December 3.
A sufferer of the 2008 Malegaon blast on Tuesday sought permission from the Bombay High Court to intervene in a plea filed by accused Lt Col Prasad Purohit seeking quashing of charges towards him.
A division bench of Justices S S Shinde and M S Karnik heard senior counsel B A Desai representing sufferer Nisar Ahmed Bilal.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi and advocate Neela Gokhale, representing Purohit, who filed a plea in September this 12 months, opposed Bilal’s software. Purohit’s counsels argued that he had sought quashing of charges towards him in view of NIA failing to avail prior sanction to prosecute him as per Section 197 of the CrPC, which prescribes process for prosecution of public servants together with prior sanction from the federal government. Rohatgi submitted that because the plea was on procedural floor, no intervention software must be entertained.
Desai, nonetheless, mentioned the sufferer has the appropriate to be heard and be made celebration to the case. Bilal misplaced his son in the blast and due to this fact was an ‘aggrieved party’ in the case, he mentioned. Desai added that Bilal was an intervenor in the trial proceedings earlier than the particular NIA courtroom in Mumbai and urged to entertain his intervention plea.
The courtroom will hear and resolve Bilal’s software on November 25 and can hear Purohit’s plea on December 3.
[ad_2]
Source