[ad_1]
New Delhi:
The Congress right this moment moved the Supreme Court towards the demolition of round 48,000 slums close to railway tracks in Delhi.
In the petition, Congress Leader Ajay Maken stated: “The removal order was passed without hearing the slum dwellers. If slums are removed, more than 2,50,000 people will be out on roads”.
“Needless to say, even if a small percentage of the displaced population if affected by COVID-19, it will prove to be a recipe for disaster in the current pandemic,” reads the petition, crammed by Mr Maken together with a slum dweller Kailash Pandit.
The senior Congress chief’s petition additionally focused the AAP and the BJP. “The BJP and the AAP played fraud upon the Supreme Court, keeping it in dark about the High Court decision on the protocol.”
The prime court docket on August 31 had directed the elimination of 48,000 slums alongside the 140 km size of railway tracks within the nationwide capital inside three months and stated “there shall not be any kind of political interference” within the execution of the plan.
“Railway Ministry and the Delhi government did not inform the Supreme Court on the protocol for removing slums as per Delhi High Court verdict. Slums cannot be removed without a plan for relocation,” reads Mr Maken’s petition, looking for course to the Railways Ministry, Delhi Government and the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) to rehabilitate the slum dwellers.
“Various policies of the government of India and that of the government of Delhi providing for prior rehabilitation and relocation of slums dwellers, survey of the affected population are neither being followed by the respondent Railways nor have been brought to the notice of this court,” the petition additional confused.
On prime court docket’s course that no court docket will grant keep within the demolition course of, the petitioners stated: “That a direction of the Apex Court restricting the Fundamental Right to Access to Justice is not only a grave violation of Article 14 and 21 as the Jhuggi dwellers cannot be treated as secondary citizens to deny them the remedies available under law.”
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink