[ad_1]
Chinese state media on Friday cautiously welcomed the five-point consensus reached by Indian and Chinese international ministers in Moscow to defuse the continuing border rigidity however stated it was New Delhi’s duty to make sure the ultimate optimistic end result.
Most official media carried a report by the state information company, Xinhua on the assembly between exterior affairs minister S Jaishankar and Chinese international minister Wang Yi on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) assembly of international ministers in Moscow on Thursday.
It stated the 2 agreed that the present scenario within the border areas “is not in the interest of either side.”
“They agreed therefore that the border troops of both sides should continue their dialogue, quickly disengage, maintain proper distance and ease tensions.”
Jaishankar and Wang had “held full, in-depth discussion with his Indian counterpart S Jaishankar on the situation in the border areas as well as bilateral ties here on Thursday,” the Xinhua report stated.
It quoted Wang as saying that it’s regular for China and India to have variations as two neighbouring main nations.
“What is important is to put these differences in a proper context vis-a-vis bilateral relation,” the report stated, quoting the senior Chinese official.
State-run hawkish nationalist tabloid Global Times carried opinion items, saying the ball is now in New Delhi’s courtroom to resolve the tensions.
In an editorial printed forward of the assembly, the tabloid stated Beijing’s talks with India “come with war preparedness”.
On the result of the bilateral assembly, the tabloid stated it exceeded the “expectations of most international observers and created favorable conditions for a possible future meeting between the leaders of the two countries”.
Also learn: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/india-china-agree-on-5-point-plan-for-resolving-border-standoff-here-s-what-you-need-to-know/story-ZoxC1MNSZcQxIRN467YE0K.html
The article then rapidly modified monitor to say the “successful implementation of the joint statement, however, depends on whether the Indian side can truly keep its word.”
Quoting specialists, it argued that it’s attainable that the joint statement will find yourself as merely “paper talk,” if India didn’t follow-up.
“We should not only observe what India says, but also what it does. For a country like India, the most important thing is how it acts,” it quoted Hu Zhiyong, from the Institute of International Relations of the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, as saying.
In a separate opinion piece, the tabloid’s editor Hu Xijin claimed the border rigidity is a results of the aggressive angle of the Indian military.
“The meeting between the two foreign ministers maintained the political communication channels between the two sides under the current critical situation. However, due to the huge differences in the understanding of the actual border control line between the two sides, the Indian army adopted an aggressive stance on the ground,” Hu wrote in a commentary printed in Mandarin.
“The two foreign ministers eased the political situation. Whether the wishes can be implemented on the spot is uncertain,” he added.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink