[ad_1]
New Delhi:
The Delhi High Court on Friday adjourned to February 18 listening to on an enchantment filed by Brijesh Thakur in opposition to his conviction and sentencing in reference to the Muzaffarpur shelter residence case.
A division bench of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar adjourned additional listening to within the matter to February 18 after the appellant facet sought an adjournment within the matter at present.
Brijesh Thakur, who’s at the moment serving his sentence within the matter, had moved an enchantment in opposition to the trial court docket orders convicting and sentencing him in reference to the case associated to sexual, bodily, and psychological abuse of over 40 minor women in a shelter residence in Muzaffarpur.
According to his enchantment, the trial court docket had performed the listening to within the matter in a “hurried manner” and thus it had violated his proper to a free and truthful trial as assured beneath the Constitution of India.
Brijesh Thakur sought to quash the trial court docket order convicting and sentencing him, together with 18 others, dated January 20 and February 11 respectively. Brijesh Thakur was the proprietor of the NGO referred to as Sewa Sankalp Evam Vikas Samiti and managed the place the place the incident happened.
Brijesh Thakur has submitted that because of the tempo at which the trial was performed and the arduous hours, which prolonged past regular court docket timings frequently the appellant was denied his statutory and basic proper.
The enchantment additionally mentioned the trial court docket has failed to understand that in a case regarding rape the prosecution should in the beginning set up that an accused is potent and thereby able to committing the alleged act.
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) opposed the plea submitting that Brijesh Thakur was convicted on account of fee of heinous offences the place, it mentioned, he systematically sexually, bodily, socially and mentally abused minor women.
The CBI, in its response submitted earlier than the High Court, has additionally said that he misused authorities grants obtained at Balika Grih in Muzaffarpur.
The Supreme Court had transferred the case from Bihar to a Delhi court docket and ordered the decide to finish it inside six months, following which the trial court docket had framed fees in opposition to 20 accused within the case.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink