[ad_1]
Several Congressman and prime academic establishments decried the coverage change that can require worldwide college students who’re within the United States with an F-1 visa to take at the least one in-person course or else face the prospect of being deported.
The Trump administration has but once more introduced a brand new coverage that can harm the financial system, hurt US establishments, and do nothing to enhance America’s security or safety, stated Congressman Bennie Thompson, chairman of the Committee on Homeland Security, and Congresswoman Kathleen Rice, chairwoman of the Border Security, Facilitation, and Operations Subcommittee in a joint assertion.
“There is no apparent legitimate reason for the administration’s inflexibility toward international students attending colleges and universities that adopt ‘online-only’ policies – the Administration seems to just want them to leave,” the 2 lawmakers stated.
International college students contribute billions of {dollars} to the US financial system and barring them from our nation will deprive Americans of badly wanted revenue. “We cannot allow President Trump to continue destroying jobs and cause needless suffering just to satisfy his anti-immigrant base. We oppose this reckless policy and the lasting harm it will cause to universities and communities across the country,” they stated.
Stanford President Marc Tessier-Lavigne expressed his concern that the choice will create extra uncertainty and complexity for worldwide college students.
“Our international students must be able to continue making progress toward completing their degrees, and as a university we intend to support them in doing so. We will be working with our peers and national associations to understand how best to accomplish that in the context of these new rules, as well as to urge the Administration to rethink its position,” he stated.
Congresswoman Debbie Dengell urged the Department of Homeland Security to assessment its determination.
“Removing these students due to circumstances beyond their control is senseless and concerning. There does not appear to be any public benefit to the US, it will harm the quality of education students receive because of the many logistical challenges, while not in the classroom many remain on campus and in the community contributing to educations and cultural experiences in many other ways, and many have already signed leases and paid tuition as well,” she stated.
Among all of the uncertainty, it’s disturbing that the federal authorities would provoke elimination proceedings for worldwide college students particularly given it’s a reversal of an earlier determination taken by the company on the on-set of the pandemic, she stated.
“Online courses are safe and sensible ways for universities to protect their students while continuing to provide a quality education while scientists study the best way to ensure students can learn in a safe environment,” the Congresswoman stated.
“With the high probability that the coronavirus pandemic will continue to make distance learning the predominant mode of instruction at colleges across the country, the rule change means that most of the estimated 1.1 million international students will be forced out of the country in September,” Chancellor Felix V Matis Rodriguez of the City University of New York stated.
In an announcement, he stated that this misguided coverage change additionally threatens to harm larger schooling at a time when the nation’s universities are working laborious to regulate to the twin well being and financial crises brought on by the pandemic.
“We are once again disappointed that our country’s leadership continues to restrict and reduce opportunities for those who seek them in the United States,” he stated including that he has instructed his administration to discover and pursue measures that might assist these college students stay within the nation and proceed their schooling at CUNY.
[ad_2]
Source link