[ad_1]
New Delhi:
The Delhi High Court at present sought response of the Centre and AAP authorities on a lawyer’s plea difficult the Rs 500 fantastic issued to him for not carrying a masks whereas he was driving alone.
Justice Navin Chawla issued discover to the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Delhi authorities, Delhi Disaster Management Authority (DDMA) and the police in search of their stand on the petition which seeks quashing of the penalty, refund of the Rs 500 paid as fantastic and compensation of Rs 10 lakh for psychological harassment suffered by the petitioner.
The petitioner, Saurabh Sharma, has claimed in his plea that on September 9 whereas driving to work he was stopped by Delhi Police officers and was fined for not carrying a masks regardless that he was alone within the automobile.
Mr Sharma, represented by advocate KC Mittal, has contended that there’s a Health Ministry notification clarifying that carrying a masks was not obligatory whereas driving alone in a automobile.
Advocate Farman Ali Magray, showing for the ministry, mentioned he wants to substantiate whether or not such a notification has been issued.
Mr Sharma, in his plea, has mentioned that the officers fining him failed to offer any government order which makes it necessary to put on masks whereas travelling alone in a personal car.
They additionally didn’t heed his request to jot down on the ticket that he was driving alone and he paid the “illegal” fantastic underneath protest, the petition has mentioned.
It has contended that within the absence of any regulation or notification making it necessary to put on a masks whereas driving alone in a personal car, the levy of fantastic on him was “ex-facie arbitrary and illegal”.
Mr Mittal, through the listening to, argued that the rules issued by DDMA solely state that the masks must be worn in a public place or administrative center, and a personal car is neither.
The DDMA contended that its tips issued in April and June this 12 months make it necessary to put on a masks in a public place and added that the Supreme Court has held {that a} non-public car is a public place.
It additionally mentioned that underneath the rules issued by it, there’s a penalty of Rs 500 for first time breach of quarantine norms in addition to for not carrying masks and for each subsequent violation there’s a fantastic of Rs 1,000.
The court docket listed the matter for additional listening to on November 18.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is printed from a syndicated feed.)
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink