[ad_1]
The lawyer who represented two Greek cops within the Harry Maguire assault case on Wednesday stated it was “shocking” that there was no apology from the Manchester United captain. Maguire was handed a 21-month suspended jail sentence on Tuesday after being discovered responsible of assaulting a police officer, tried bribery and different costs by a courtroom in Greece. The England defender, who didn’t attend Tuesday’s trial on the Greek island of Syros, rapidly indicated his intention to attraction, releasing a press release suggesting he and his household and associates had been the victims.
Manchester United additionally backed their participant, who denies all the costs.
The 27-year-old –the world’s most costly defender — was arrested final week after an incident at a nightclub in Mykonos and spent two nights in police custody earlier than flying dwelling.
Maguire’s brother Joe and buddy Christopher Sharman had been additionally discovered responsible on a spread of costs and sentenced to 13 months in jail, suspended for 3 years.
Lawyer Ioannis Paradissis stated an apology would, in Greek legislation, make an enormous distinction in any appeals course of however stated none had been supplied.
“(The police officers) told me they are still waiting for an apology and they haven’t had any,” Paradissis informed the BBC.
“This is what I find quite shocking and quite unsporting. Fair play means when I’ve done something wrong I apologise or at least I say I am sorry for what happened to the other person.”
Paradissis stated an attraction would begin the trial afresh however that in Greek legislation among the accusations could possibly be withdrawn if an apology got and that “the outcome might be different”.
England withdrawal
England supervisor Gareth Southgate withdrew Maguire from his squad for the Nations League matches towards Iceland and Denmark subsequent month, having initially chosen him on Tuesday.
According to media stories, a battle began at a nightclub over claims Maguire’s sister Daisy had been injected with what the defence claimed was a suspected drug.
Paradissis stated this was “irrelevant” in respect of the assault on the officers and that it was “strange” that Maguire’s sister had not talked about this when she was interviewed by police.
Asked about Maguire’s declare that he was the sufferer, Paradissis stated: “We don’t have the same definition of what a victim is then, because how can you be a victim and the policemen have been assaulted, hit, that were just doing their jobs?
“They went dwelling on the day with accidents. How can they not be a sufferer?”
Promoted
Asked whether Maguire and his co-defendants would have known the officers were police, Paradissis said: “Of course, as a result of that is the very first thing they stated. The cops had been there for different duties and so they heard a brawl.
“So they heard some people fighting and went there to break up a fight. They said, ‘We’re police, stop fighting’. They were not in uniform but they showed their professional IDs.”
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink