[ad_1]
Amir Hayat and Ashfaq Ahmed have been charged with 5 counts of breaching cricket’s anti-corruption guidelines and provisionally suspended with quick impact.
ICC suspends UAE cricketers over corruption costs. (Reuters Photo)
HIGHLIGHTS
- Amir Hayat and Ashfaq Ahmed have been charged with 5 counts of breaching anti-corruption guidelines
- Amir Hayat and Ashfaq Ahmed have 14 days to reply to the corruption costs
- Hayat has turned out for UAE in 9 ODIs and 4 T20I whereas Ahmed is capped 28 instances by UAE
International Cricket Council (ICC) on Sunday charged United Arab Emirates (UAE) players Amir Hayat and Ashfaq Ahmed with 5 counts of breaching cricket’s anti-corruption guidelines and provisionally suspended with quick impact.
Both Amir Hayat and Ashfaq Ahmed have 14 days from 13 September to reply to the costs. The ICC is not going to make any additional remark in respect to those costs at this stage.
The Emirates Cricket Board (ECB) had suspended Ashfaq throughout the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup Qualifier in October final yr however no formal costs had been laid to date. Both Amir and Ashfaq have been charged with the next breaches of the ICC Anti-Corruption Code:
Article 2.1.3: Seeking, accepting, providing or agreeing to simply accept any bribe or different Reward to: (a) repair or to contrive in any means or in any other case to affect improperly the end result, progress, conduct or another facet of any International Match; or (b) guarantee for Betting or different corrupt functions the incidence of a specific incident in an International Match.
Article 2.4.2: failing to confide in the ACU (with out pointless delay) the receipt of any reward, cost, hospitality or different profit, (a) that the Participant knew or ought to have recognized was given to him/her to acquire (instantly or not directly) any breach of the Anti-Corruption Code, or (b) that was made or given in circumstances that would carry the Participant or the game of cricket into disrepute.
Article 2.4.3: failing to confide in the ACU (with out pointless delay) all presents (whether or not financial or in any other case), hospitality and/or different non-contractual advantages provided to a Participant which have a price of US$750 or extra, whether or not or not the circumstances set out in Article 2.4.2 are current, save that there shall be no obligation to reveal any (i) private presents, hospitality and/or different non-contractual advantages provided by or on behalf of any shut good friend or relative of the Participant, (ii) any meals or beverage presents or (iii) cricket hospitality presents in reference to Matches the Participant is taking part in.
Article 2.4.4: failing to confide in the ACU (with out pointless delay) full particulars of any approaches or invites acquired by the Participant to have interaction in Corrupt Conduct beneath the Anti-Corruption Code.
Article 2.4.5: failing to confide in the ACU full particulars of any information or issues that got here to his consideration which will proof Corrupt Conduct beneath the Code by one other Participant.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink