[ad_1]
The PCB on Friday suggested banned Test leg-spinner Danish Kaneria to approach the England Cricket Board (ECB) if he desires to resume playing membership or home cricket. A determined Kaneria, banned since 2012, desires to resume cricket actions to earn his livelihood however the PCB stated the board can’t do a lot for the reason that punishment was handed to him by the ECB.
“Article 6.8 of the ECB Anti-Corruption Code, which is applicable in this case, clearly states only the chair of the anti-corruption tribunal, which has imposed a period of ineligibility on a player, had the discretion to permit the player to participate,” the PCB stated in a press launch. “As such, you are advised to approach the ECB as per Article 6.8 of the ECB Anti-Corruption Code,”
Kaneria is barely the second Hindu to play Test cricket for Pakistan. He scalped 261 wickets earlier than being banned by the ECB for all times for spot-fixing in English county matches. Kaneria, after denying his involvement in spot-fixing and pleading his innocence lastly admitted in late 2018 to a overseas tv community that he was responsible.
The banned leg-spinner maintains that he suffered unimaginable and incomprehensible hardships, each professionally and personally, and continues to undergo with every passing day. But the PCB reminded Kaneria that since he had exhausted all his avenues to enchantment in opposition to the life ban, solely the ECB can now evaluate his case.
“The life ban was imposed by the ECB and upheld by all ICC Members as per Article 9 of the ICC/PCB Anti-Corruption Code, and the only way it could have been overturned was by way of appeal, an avenue which has already been explored,” the PCB launch stated.
In an analogous enchantment by former Test captain, Salim Malik, PCB stated it received’t have the ability to assist him except he co-operates. Malik was banned for all times for match fixing by the PCB in 2000 on the suggestions of the Justice (retd.) Malik Qayyum inquiry fee however his punishment was put aside by a decrease court docket in 2008.
In a reply to Malik, the Board stated that he had failed to reply to transcripts offered by ICC of April 2000 dialog. The PCB reminded him that he himself had accepted the “wrongdoing” and his enchantment doesn’t change that incontrovertible fact that he cheated.
“You chose not to respond to the contents of the transcripts of a conversation that took place in April 2000. In the backdrop of the above, the PCB will be unable to proceed any further until such time you respond on the said matter,” the discharge acknowledged.
[ad_2]
Source link