[ad_1]
New Delhi:
Congress’s Ghulam Nabi Azad, one of many key dissenters within the social gathering, as we speak provided one other rationalization of the social gathering’s current stoop in the case of elections. Speaking in the midst of the most recent controversy to hit the social gathering – sharp criticism by social gathering colleague Kapil Sibal after the Bihar election – Mr Azad mentioned leaders who get a ticket now flip their backs on the warmth and dirt of marketing campaign, preferring as a substitute to stay ensconced in five-star consolation.
“The problem with our leaders is that if they get a party ticket, they first book a five-star hotel. Even there they want a deluxe place. Then they will not move without an air-conditioned car. They will not go to places where there is an untarred road,” he informed information company ANI.
“Elections are not fought from five-star hotels… We can’t win until we change this culture,” he added.
From parachuting outdoors in-charges to poor management from the highest, a lot has been cited as the rationale for the social gathering’s dismal efficiency.
“Many blame the leaders. The Congress president or Rahul Gandhi,” Mr Azad mentioned, pointing as a substitute to native leaders of the social gathering who’re appointed to high posts.
“They have lost the connection with people. The block leaders or district leaders. The moment someone gets a rank, they print their letter pads and visiting cards and think the job is done. But that is where the work begins,” he added.
Indicating that the highest management was not going flawed both, he mentioned beneath Sonia Gandhi, the Congress gained 5 states in 4 to 5 years, “when I was in-charge of election affairs”.
“We won in Karnataka, Kerala and we formed an alliance in Tamil Nadu. In Andhra Pradesh, we won in 2004. The party leadership did not interfere in the party functioning,” he mentioned.
“In Andhra Pradesh, we had five parliamentary seats which increased to 37 in 2004. The UPA-I government was formed mainly because of Congress’s performance in Andhra Pradesh. In the assembly elections, our seats increased to around 180. In one-and-a-half years, I visited Delhi only thrice. I visited Hyderabad city only twice as most of the programmes were conducted in the rural areas. I had remained union minister but still, I worked in the rural areas. Elections are not won through a five-star culture,” he added.
He mentioned that so long as office-bearers should not elected however appointed, they might not join with the grassroots. There needs to be people who find themselves elected, Mr Azad added.
In the interview with The Indian Express, Mr Sibal had pointed to the social gathering’s reverses in Bihar, Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat, and mentioned he had been compelled to go public together with his views as “there has been no dialogue and there seems to be no effort for a dialogue by the leadership”.
Three key leaders within the Congress had been vocal with their criticism about his remarks. Among them Salman Khurshid, a Gandhi household loyalist, had mentioned, “I have said very clearly that the Gandhis are leaders of the Congress. Nobody can deny this. I don’t worry about whether or not we have a president”.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink