[ad_1]
A division bench of the Bombay High Court has known as for the University Grants Commission (UGC) to be made a party to a public curiosity litigation (PIL) that has challenged a Maharashtra authorities decision of June19 which determined to not conduct exams for skilled and non-professional programs due to the state of affairs brought on by novel coronavirus pandemic. The bench additionally requested Maharashtra state to reply to the petition.
The PIL filed by Dhananjay Kulkarni, a retired trainer from Pune, has acknowledged that as a result of UGC was the regulation authority, Maharashtra state was not empowered to resolve and announce the mode of evaluation for last yr college students, and has sought to put aside and quash the federal government decision.
The division bench of Justice AA Sayed and Justice MS Karnik was knowledgeable by Kulkarni’s advocate Uday Warunjikar that the choice of the upper and technical schooling ministry to not conduct exams for skilled and non-professional programs was not legitimate.
The authorities decision had acknowledged that college students of non-professional programs, who’ve cleared all earlier semesters and are not looking for to seem for final semester exams of their last yr ought to give in writing that they are not looking for to seem for last exams to their respective universities. These college students will be awarded a rating primarily based on the typical of their combination marks of earlier semesters and supplied with outcomes, and had given an exception for these college students who weren’t happy with their rating and wished to fare higher to given a written endeavor to the impact which might allow them to take an non-compulsory examination later.
But the federal government decision had acknowledged that it’s going to not be in a position to conduct last semester exams of skilled programs like engineering, pharmacy, lodge administration, structure, planning, administration research, laptop research, legislation, bodily schooling and pedagogy, however had given college students to take the non-compulsory examination for higher scores later.
The plea acknowledged, “There is an artificial classification made by the state among students who are admitted to professional and non-professional courses. If the state government is not going to conduct examinations for non-professional courses because of the coronavirus outbreak, there is no reason to conduct exams for professional courses either. There is no logic behind the decision and it is arbitrary and unreasonable and therefore court’s intervention is required.”
Warunjikar additional submitted that the twin evaluation methodology provided to the scholars within the GR was additionally with out logic and such strategies can not be adopted whereas granting levels. Students are given the choice to seem for exams or settle for common marks primarily based on previous efficiency.
“Such exercise is unknown to the educational field and therefore there is non-application of mind on the part of the state,” mentioned Warunjikar and submitted that even the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 didn’t allow the state authorities to take such a choice and solely the UGC might take such selections, therefore the choice was past the purview of the provisions of UGC Act as effectively.
The plea acknowledged, “The hanging sword of uncertainty is faced by final year students and GR is not clear as to when the exams will be conducted and the academic year will get over. “Fate of a large number of students who wish to take admission for the post-graduation courses is kept in a hanging situation.”
Stating this, the petitioner sought from the Court to quash and put aside the GR and pending listening to, sought a keep on the identical. After listening to the submissions the courtroom directed that UGC also needs to be made party to the PIL and directed the state to file response to the plea inside every week, the Court posted additional listening to on July 17.
[ad_2]
Source link