[ad_1]
The Madras High Court on Friday stated it could pronounce orders on July 27 on a batch of pleas, together with one by the Tamil Nadu authorities, towards the Centre’s choice not to grant 50 per cent quota to OBCs in medical seats surrendered by the state in all-India quota (AIQ) for under-graduate, PG and dental programs in 2020-21.
The First Bench, comprising Chief Justice AP Sahi and Justice Senthil Kumar Ramamoorthy, reserved orders after a marathon listening to on the batch of petitions.
The state authorities and a few political events similar to DMK, All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), CPI (M) and CPI and others had moved the court docket on the problem.
The events all through the listening to contended that the Central authorities is barely an agent and a counseling authority to fill the seats in accordance to the reservation.
Advocate General Vijay Narayan, who appeared on behalf of the State authorities, argued that the Medical Council of India (MCI) rules itself said that the reservation of seats in medical faculties is as per legal guidelines prevailing in the states and Union Territories.
“This is very significant as the Centre is aware that the reservation in Tamil Nadu is 69 per cent in proportion to the population. The Supreme Court itself has said that reservations can exceed 50 per cent if there is quantitative data to show that you need a higher percentage for reservations in the state,” he argued.
Additional Solicitor General R Sankaranarayanan, who appeared on behalf of the Centre, contended that after the seats are transferred to the AIQ by the state and all of the rights hooked up in the direction of the seats are additionally transferred.
“The idea was to create a common pool to be available to all students cutting across the country,” he argued.
Citing a number of judgments by the Supreme Court, he additionally stated that 50 per cent reservation can’t be exceeded because it is not going to be applicable for a pupil coming from one other state.
With the political events arguing for OBC quota, the bench recorded the submissions by elevating queries in the arguments made by the counsel.
The division bench additionally sought for Puducherry’s submissions on the matter and later gave time for the union territory’s counsel to submit her counter.
The bench then adjourned the petitions to July 27 for saying orders.
The Supreme Court had on Monday requested the Madras High Court to determine the pleas, together with one filed by Tamil Nadu authorities, towards the Centre’s choice not to grant 50 per cent quota to OBCs in medical seats surrendered by the state in all India quota for underneath graduate, put up graduate and dental programs in 2020-21.
[ad_2]
Source link