[ad_1]
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s call for bolstering border defences in Tibet and “sinicisation” of Tibetan Buddhism are “misguided” and “unrealistic”, the pinnacle of the Tibetan government-in-exile has mentioned.
Lobsang Sangay, the sikyong or president of the Tibetan government-in-exile, additionally expressed concern at China’s navy build-up on the Tibetan plateau, and questioned Beijing’s “military expansionism and its intentions on the ‘five fingers’ as well as on the border regions of Himachal Pradesh (HP) and Uttarakhand”.
Xi had given a call to advertise the “sinicisation” of Tibetan Buddhism and to construct an “impregnable fortress” to keep up stability in Tibet whereas addressing China’s prime management on Saturday at a discussion board on future governance in Tibet.
Also Read: Sinicise Tibetan Buddhism, construct fortress round Tibet, says Xi Jinping
Xi was quoted by state-run Xinhua information company as saying that the federal government and navy leaders ought to “solidify border defences and ensure frontier security” in addition to guarantee “national security and enduring peace and stability” in Tibet, which shares a protracted border with India.
Responding to Xi’s remarks about constructing “an impregnable fortress” in Tibet, Sangay mentioned: “China has been quietly militarising the Tibetan plateau for over 60 years under the pretext of development and modernisation. For Tibet, this has only led to an influx of soldiers, Han (Chinese) settlers, and weapons.
“For its neighbours, this militarisation of the Tibetan plateau has led to a military build-up on its borders, jeopardising the already contentious border regions as evidenced by the recent Galwan incident.”
Sangay mentioned that “to foster stability in Tibet, China must first address the genuine grievances of the Tibetan people and not to forget the 154 Tibetans who have set themselves on fire in protest against Chinese policies in Tibet”.
He added that the growing militarisation of Tibet is a “serious source of concern for the Tibetans as well as India and Asia’s security at large. Restoring the status of Tibet as a zone of peace with its historical demilitarised border with India is the only way of enduring peace in Asia.”
Sangay, who heads the Central Tibetan Administration primarily based in Dharamshala, HP, mentioned: “The root cause of instability in Tibet is not the Tibetan people’s faith, but the repressive and failed policies of the Chinese government. The continuation of these hard-line policies and repression is only going to make matters worse. That’s why genuine autonomy based on the ‘middle way approach’ is the only viable solution.”
He additionally refuted Xi’s call for “sinicising”. “China’s policy of sinicising Tibetan Buddhism is a misguided attempt at controlling the Tibetan people’s religious belief and the reincarnation system. China must draw on its past experiences and allow the Tibetan people to maintain its distinct faith and religious traditions,” he mentioned.
The remarks had been a reference to elevated efforts by Beijing to decide on the subsequent Dalai Lama. Chinese authorities have mentioned they might reject any successor to the present Dalai Lama chosen exterior China, and specialists have contended that any Indian involvement in the problem may doubtlessly have an effect on bilateral relations.
The Chinese president’s assertions and Sangay’s response got here towards the backdrop of the dragging India-China border standoff.
Tensions flared once more on Monday, when the Indian Army mentioned it had thwarted China’s “provocative military movements” to vary the established order alongside the Line of Actual Control (LAC) on the southern financial institution of the Pangong Lake.
Some specialists have prompt that the Indian authorities ought to play up the Tibet card as a part of efforts to stress the Chinese to finish the stalled disengagement and de-escalation course of on the LAC.
Sangay mentioned Buddhism is extra necessary than communism for Tibetans.
“To force them to treat communism as more important than their faith is not only a violation of international religious freedom, but is also deeply misguided. Sinicization of Tibetan Buddhism is never going to work. The last 60 years of Chinese rule in Tibet is a testament to that fact,” he added.
The demolition of Larung Gar and Yarchen Gar, two of the most important Buddhist institutes in the world, by Chinese authorities was a “tragic example of Chinese atrocities on Tibetan Buddhism”, he mentioned.
Despite their struggling, the folks in Tibet are “still strong and remain faithfully devoted to the Dalai Lama”, Sangay mentioned.
He additionally emphasised that, as envisioned by the Dalai Lama, Tibetans search “genuine autonomy within the framework of the Chinese constitution”. He added, “Resumption of dialogue with…the Dalai Lama or his envoys remains the only foreseeable solution to resolve the Tibet issue.”
The Central Symposium on Tibet Works was the Chinese Communist Party’s most necessary discussion board for Tibet insurance policies.
The two-day assembly was the primary such gathering since 2015.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink