[ad_1]
This is the greatest tl;dr I might make, authentic decreased by 87%. (I’m a bot)
Thereafter, Elsevier forwarded me an e mail from Prof Steven Newmaster of University of Guelph, who wrote a lengthy record of points with respect to the article and asking Elsevier to retract the paper.
According to Elsevier’s Policy on Article Withdrawal, ‘in a particularly restricted quantity of instances, an article from the on-line database the place the article is clearly defamatory, or infringes others’ legal rights, or the place the article is, or we have now good motive to count on it is going to be, the topic of a courtroom order, or the place the article, if acted upon, may pose a severe well being danger.
In June, Philips and his colleagues issued their very own legal threats in opposition to each Elsevier and the journal, claiming that the retraction was “Highly defamatory” and “Against the principles of professional ethics and natural justice” and demanded both that the paper be restored inside a week or that they obtain 100 million Rupees in compensation.
Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top key phrases: article#1Elsevier#2Philips#3let#4printed#5
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink