[ad_1]
The Supreme Court on Monday quashed the choice of National Law School of India University, Bengaluru (NLSIU) to hold a separate entrance examination, National Law Aptitude Test (NLAT) for admission to its the 5 years built-in LLB programme and the postgraduate LLM programme instead of Common Law Admissions Test (CLAT).
A 3-judge bench headed by justice Ashok Bhushan put aside the September Three notification issued by NLSIU which had introduced NLAT instead of CLAT.
The bench which additionally comprised justices R Subhash Reddy and MR Shah ordered NLSIU to perform admissions as per CLAT and ordered that admissions needs to be accomplished by the mid of October.
Admission to LLB programs provided by 22 National Law Universities (NLUs) in numerous states is predicated on the CLAT rating which is held yearly by a consortium of NLUs. CLAT is scheduled to be held on September 28.
However, NLSIU determined that it might hold a separate entrance check this yr, the NLAT, in view of the delay in conducting CLAT due to Covid-19. A notification was additionally issued on September Three saying its determination to hold NLAT.
“Candidates will be selected on the basis of the aggregate marks secured in an online home-based Entrance Examination known as NLAT. The NLAT 2020 will test applicants for admission to the undergraduate B.A., LL.B. (Hons), and postgraduate LL.M programmes commencing in 2020,” the notification stated.
It additionally made it clear that NLSIU is not going to settle for CLAT 2020 scores for admission for the educational Year 2020-21. According to the notification, NLSIU most popular to opt-out of CLAT this yr as a result of it has to full admissions earlier than the top of September 2020 failing which it should inevitably lead to a ‘Zero Year’ with no admission. This is as a result of the NLSIU follows a trimester system with Three phrases of 90 days length.
“Each term must accommodate 60 hours of classroom instruction in each course and adequately provide for examination and evaluation processes. Further, the academic offering for the 3rd, 4th, and 5th year of the B.A., LL.B programme as well as the LL.M programme is fully integrated and requires a common academic calendar,” the notification defined.
Later one other notification was issued stipulating technical necessities for writing the examination. As per the notification, candidates ought to have a pc system with a minimal web bandwidth of 1 Mbps and exams could be given utilizing laptops or desktops alone with built-in webcam and microphone. Further, solely Windows working system can be allowed.
Dr. Venkat Rao, who was a former Vice-Chancellor at NLSIU, approached the Supreme Court difficult NLAT stating that the choice taken by the Executive Council of NLSIU to conduct NLAT was unlawful and with none authorized authority.
Further, the notification mandating technical necessities to give the examination are onerous and forged an unreasonable burden on college students, the plea stated. A mother or father of one of many regulation college aspirants was additionally a petitioner together with Rao.
The Supreme Court had on September 11 allowed NLSIU to hold NLAT as an interim measure however requested the college not to declare outcomes or admit college students until the court docket arrives at a ultimate determination. The college had performed NLAT pursuant to that order.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink