[ad_1]
Begum, now 20, had her British citizenship stripped by then-Home Secretary Sajid Javid on February 19, 2019, after she was present in a northern Syrian refugee camp.
She challenged that call however on June 13, 2019, the federal government refused her software for go away to enter the UK to pursue her enchantment.
The Court of Appeal and a Divisional Court of the High Court on Thursday dominated Begum should be allowed to return to the United Kingdom to pursue her enchantment earlier than the Special Immigrations Appeals Commission (SIAC) “albeit subject to such controls as the Secretary of State deems appropriate.”
She is at present in a detention camp run by the Syrian Democratic Forces.
SIAC present in its choice that Begum additionally holds Bangladeshi citizenship by descent. The courtroom has not answered the query about whether or not she will be able to be stripped of her British citizenship.
Begum’s lawyer, Daniel Furner, of Birnberg Peirce Solicitors, mentioned the best to justice should not be affected as a result of a case is critical or tough, or nationwide safety is concerned.
“Ms. Begum has never had a fair opportunity to give her side of the story,” he mentioned.
“Ms Begum is not afraid of facing British justice, she welcomes it. But the stripping of her citizenship without a chance to clear her name is not justice, it is the opposite.”
Human rights group Liberty, which intervened in Begum’s enchantment to say she couldn’t have a good trial whereas preventing the case from a refugee camp, welcomed the ruling.
Liberty lawyer Katie Lines mentioned: “The right to a fair trial is not something the government can take away on a whim. It is a fundamental part of our justice system and equal access to justice must apply to everyone.
“Banishing somebody is the act of a authorities shirking its tasks and it’s important that merciless and irresponsible authorities choices can be correctly challenged and overturned.”
A UK Home Office spokesperson said the decision was “very disappointing” and it would apply for permission to appeal against the judgment.
“The authorities’s prime precedence stays sustaining our nationwide safety and holding the general public protected,” the spokesperson added.
Mohammed Shafiq, CEO of the Ramadhan Foundation, a UK-based Muslim organization that works to build cohesion between communities, said in a statement: “The choice of the Court of Appeal to enable Shamima Begum to return to the UK is the best choice and British residents should welcome it.
“This is not about any alleged crimes she may have committed but about the principle you cannot have a two tier citizenship where those of a certain ethnic background born in this country are treated differently to their white counterparts,” he added.
Shafiq mentioned ISIS was an “evil entity” opposed by British Muslims and that Begum should be held to account for any alleged crimes, however lawmakers should not make choices “to appear as if they were tough.”
He known as the choice a “great victory” for these who consider in equal society and oppose discrimination in making use of citizenship guidelines.
[ad_2]
Source link