[ad_1]
There is “no question of repealing” the three legal guidelines towards which farmers are protesting however “all other options” are open as the federal government discusses the vary of points flagged by farmer leaders, a high authorities official informed The Indian Express.
The high authorities official mentioned that “the resolution can only be found through discussions” and added that if the farmers are prepared to proceed their protests for long, the federal government is “also prepared”.
He was talking a day after the federal government informed farmers it was prepared to amend sure provisions of the legal guidelines, give a written assurance on MSP and procurement, however farmer representatives insisted on a repeal of all three legal guidelines.
Giving in to it will underline an absence of political will and might “permanently damage” prospects of bringing in much-needed agriculture reforms, mentioned a senior chief. Given this, one choice, a supply mentioned, could possibly be “dropping some provisions or keeping the implementation of the contentious law in abeyance”.
“Of course, we will wait to see what farmers come back to us with on December 9,” mentioned the highest official. “But we are in no rush. As of now, whatever the Agriculture Minister (Narendra Singh Tomar) has told the farmers…that’s the Government’s stand.”
Preparing for the December 9 spherical of talks, on Sunday, Tomar, who is main the Government’s staff within the talks, held a gathering together with his two deputies Kailash Choudhary and Parshottam Rupala.
The authorities would have most popular to maintain the discussions with a smaller staff, the highest official mentioned, as, “it is challenging to hold negotiations with 35-40 people at the same table”.
In the primary assembly on December 1, the federal government had proposed {that a} small staff together with some authorities officers might look into the difficulty however representatives of farmer unions had spurned that supply saying discussions ought to occur with everybody, even when a choose few of them converse.
On Saturday, earlier than Tomar and Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal headed for the fifth spherical of discussions with the farmers, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had held a gathering with them and Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and Home Minister Amit Shah.
Sources mentioned the federal government will area both Singh or Shah or each at a “later stage” if it senses any climbdown by the farmers on the gives the federal government has made to date.
“The idea was to bring down the temperature with the first round of talks – we were quite aware that it would go on for several rounds – and find common ground so that seniors could step in. However, the farmers have not yet shown any sign of yielding,” mentioned a senior BJP chief. “We have not given up hope that both the government and the farmers can find a middle path.”
Still, a bit of social gathering leaders admitted that there might have been extra spadework when the protests erupted. “Some leaders feel that if there was more time between the introduction of the Bills and their passage, we could have avoided such a scenario,” mentioned a frontrunner.
“At least, some Opposition parties would not have the chance to throw their weight behind the protesters if we had accepted their demand for sending it to a parliamentary panel.”
The high authorities official mentioned that MSP can’t be hardwired into the legislation as it’ll have vital monetary implications and will lead to inflation.
After Saturday’s assembly Tomar had mentioned that “many issues” had come ahead throughout the discussions, and regardless of the final result, will probably be within the farmers’ pursuits.
He mentioned that the “APMC Act is a state Act” and the federal government neither has the “intention to affect the state’s mandis nor these are being affected by the new farm laws.”
Government sources had indicated {that a} particular session of the Parliament to resolve the standoff is being thought of however a choice has not been taken on that but.
© The Indian Express (P) Ltd
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink