[ad_1]
New Delhi:
The Supreme Court at present declined to just accept lawyer-activist Prashant Bhushan’s clarification and remorse in a case of contempt over his 2009 interview calling Chief Justices corrupt. The court docket stated it wanted to verify whether or not Prashant Bhushan’s feedback on corruption amounted to contempt of court docket. The court docket will hear the case once more subsequent Monday.
“We need to check whether statements made regarding corruption amounts to contempt of court. Thus we need to hear the matter,” stated the Supreme Court.
Senior lawyer and former legislation minister Shanthi Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan’s father, requested the court docket to record the case for when bodily hearings resumed after the coronavirus lockdown. But the Supreme Court didn’t agree.
Last week, the court docket had reserved its order.
The contempt case entails statements that Prashant Bhushan made throughout an interview to Tehelka journal in 2009, by which he stated half the 16 Chief Justices of India had been corrupt.
The Supreme Court, which is listening to one other contempt petition towards Mr Bhushan, once more for feedback on Chief Justice of India SA Bobde, stated, “There is a line between free speech and contempt… There is freedom of speech and expression and then contempt”.
The second case refers to remarks the lawyer made on Twitter on viral pictures of Chief Justice Bobde attempting out a superbike.
In a press release within the earlier listening to on Tuesday, Mr Bhushan expressed remorse: “What I said caused hurt to any of the them ( CJIs) or to their families in any way, I regret.” The phrase corruption was utilized in “wide sense meaning lack of propriety”, he stated. “I did not mean only financial corruption or deriving any pecuniary advantage.”
The different particular person accused of contempt, senior journalist Tarun Tejpal, apologised for publishing the assertion.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink