[ad_1]
The Supreme Court is hearing a plea filed by college students against the UGC’s July 6 order to conduct final year exams by September 30. A bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash reddy and MR Shah started the hearing at 11am. The state of Maharashtra is arguing represented by senior advocate Arvind Datar.
Earlier on August 14, a bench of Justices Ashok Bhushan, Subhash Reddy and MR Shah adjourned the matter for August 18. Arguing for petitioners on that day, senior advocate Shyam Divan had advised the Court that college students represent a homogenous class and well being of final year college students is as vital as that of different year or batches. Appearing for different petitioner, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi additionally argued that faculties throughout India can’t be anticipated to have similar amenities. Many schools haven’t held courses. He additionally opposed holding of final year examination saying how can UGC resolve to carry necessary exams when instructing has not been held and Covid-19 pandemic is on the peak.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court on Monday rejected the plea filed by 11 college students to postpone the JEE Mains and NEET exams as a result of Covid- 19 state of affairs. A SC bench mentioned “life has to go on” regardless of the outbreak of the viral illness and the court docket can’t put the profession of scholars in jeopardy by interfering with the choice of the National Testing Agency (NTA) to carry the examinations in September.
Check Latest Updates on proceedings right here:
No contradiction between April 29 and July 6 UG guidelines: SC
Delhi raises the query that there’s discrimination between these Universities which adopted April 29 guidelines of UGC and people which at the moment are being pressured to conduct take a look at.
Court says, “There is no contradiction between April 29 and July 6 guidelines. The latest guidelines only prescribes the methodology of holding exams.”
No rational distinction final year and different year college students: Advocate
There isn’t any rational distinction between final year and different year college students. Other year college students are being assessed on inside evaluation whereas final year college students’ life put to danger by asking them to both take on-line or offline take a look at, the advocate mentioned.
Public well being is the difficulty, state has energy to direct cancellation of exams: Advocate
Students can’t entry libraries, textbooks, tuition. Nobody needs to enterprise out as aged folks at dwelling are susceptible. Even for on-line exams college students endure from connectivity issues. So public well being is straight in situation and state has energy to direct cancellation of exams, the advocate representing Delhi mentioned
6 out of eight universities in Delhi have accomplished exams, however college students are dealing with difficulties: Sr advocate representing Delhi
Delhi tells SC that out of eight state universities six have accomplished exams. But college students are confronted with handicaps for offline or on-line exams. Senior advocate KV Vishwanathan representing Delhi.
UGC didn’t seek the advice of any medical consultants to grasp the realities earlier than issuing guidelines: Advocate General of WB
Kishore Dutta, Advocate General of West Bengal tells Court that state is obligation certain by its constitutional obligation to guard well being of residents. This concern shouldn’t be addressed by UGC. UGC didn’t seek the advice of any well being or medical consultants to grasp the sensible floor realities earlier than issuing July 6 order.
South Bengal districts affected by Cyclone Amphan, most individuals have been evacuated: Advocate
South Bengal districts are affected by cyclone and most of the people together with college students have been evacuated. To maintain bodily exams shouldn’t be potential. On holding on-line exams each state and college students lack digital infrastructure, the advocate mentioned.
Section 12 of UGC Act requires session with states and college: WB
West Bengal factors out that UGC order of July 6 shouldn’t be a statutory doc however an govt order. Section 12 of UGC Act required session with states and college. This was not accomplished.
West Bengal begins argument
Odisha concludes arguments and West Bengal begins arguments. Senior advocate Jaideep Gupta is addressing Court for group of college academics of West Bengal
Odisha tells SC that it’s not potential to carry exams because of Covid state of affairs
Odisha tells SC that it’s not potential to carry exams because of Covid state of affairs. It acknowledged that examination is end result of 6 semesters and college students are being marked primarily based on efficiency of 5 semesters.
Now Covid circumstances have peaked in Odisha. More than 2 lakh college students are in final year. Most college students have returned again dwelling. Several college students are in rural areas the place connectivity and availability of laptops and pc is a problem and therefore on-line exams can’t be carried out.
Court is hearing the arguments made by state of Odisha
Maharashtra concludes argument. Now Court is hearing the state of Odisha.
UGC didn’t seek the advice of states earlier than releasing guidelines: Maharashtra tells SC
Maharashtra tells SC that UGC didn’t seek the advice of states affected by Covid earlier than popping out with its July 6 guidelines. It additional identified that on April 29 the UGC Guidelines mentioned universities ‘may’ conduct guidelines. This discretion shouldn’t be there now as Universities need to compulsorily conduct exams by September 30.
Most college students enrolled in Maharashtra are from completely different states: Advocate
Maharashtra as we speak has 1.four lakh energetic Covid circumstances. Senior advocate Arvind Datar representing the Maharashtra state mentioned,”There are 13 universities in Maharashtra with 11 lakh college students. Most college students finding out in Maharashtra come from outdoors the state. At current most schools are Covid testing centres. Hostels have been transformed into quarantine amenities. There isn’t any means universities can conduct exams by September 30 in these circumstances.”
‘No dispute that Maharashtra is suffering the worst conditions’: SC
Court agrees that there is no such thing as a dispute that Maharashtra is struggling the worst because of Covid
UGC can’t insist on holdiing exams, it’s on college’s discretion: Advocate
Advocate Datar responds that a unprecedented state of affairs of Covid is prevailing. Also UGC can’t insist on holding exams by September 30 as conduct of examination, when to carry it relies upon on University’s discretion, Datar mentioned.
University can’t dilute requirements mounted by UGC on holding exams: SC
Court tells Datar, “If there is a direction by UGC fixing the standard of holding examination, can the University dilute those standards? If that is permitted, every University will have a different system of passing students. You cannot dilute the standards.”
All universities throughout India don’t comply with semester system: SC
Court tells Datar that every one universities throughout India don’t comply with semester system. The court docket needs Datar to take a holistic view of nation. Datar replies that his directions are that semester system is adopted throughout the nation. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta showing for UGC denies this assertion.
5 semester are over, inside evaluation for sixth semester is completed: Advocate Datar
Arvind Datar tells court docket that welfare of scholars have to be the query that must be seen. He factors out that the tutorial evaluation adopted in Maharashtra assesses college students from Day 1. He claims that in Universities in Maharashtra comply with semester system. At current 5 semesters are over and inside evaluation for sixth semester is completed.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink