[ad_1]
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday stated that Delhi University can’t expect college students to have 70 per cent minimal attendance to sit down for exams if it was not taking classes for the entire interval prescribed for a course.
“You cannot say students have to have 70 per cent minimum attendance while you teach only 40 per cent of the prescribed study period,” a bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan advised the varsity whereas listening to the plea of a legislation student who might not sit for his first semester exams final 12 months on medical grounds.
The excessive courtroom additionally issued discover to the Centre, Bar Council of India and the college in search of their stand on the student’s attraction towards a single choose order of November final 12 months dismissing his plea in search of waiver of scarcity of attendance and permitting him to sit down for his first semester exams.
The single choose had dismissed his plea on the bottom that there was a division bench order of the Delhi High Court which held that in skilled programs, the requirement of accomplishing minimal attendance was non-negotiable.
During the listening to on Tuesday, the bench headed by Chief Justice stated to the varsity and the BCI that there must be some mechanism to maintain college students just like the petitioner, who since March 2017 has been affected by an sickness for which there was no clear and sure prognosis, “instead of creating a wall”.
According to the plea of Abhishek Singh, whereas typhoid was suspected there was additionally a risk that he was affected by tuberculosis.
His lawyer, Kamal Mehta, advised the bench that the primary semester final 12 months started from September 1, 2019 and the exams had been held in December 2019.
During the listening to by way of video convention, the Singh’s lawyer stated that representations had been made to the varsity to permit the student to sit down for the primary semester exams, regardless of the shortage of attendance, in view of his persevering with sickness. However, no response was acquired from the college and later he was advised his identify can be struck off the varsity rolls.
The excessive courtroom on Tuesday requested the varsity to verify when the primary semester commenced final 12 months and when the exams had been held.
It additionally advised the student’s lawyer to seek out out what was the minimal interval of examine prescribed/required for LLB course by DU and whether or not the identical was being adhered to.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink