[ad_1]
The Bombay High Court on Tuesday sought to know what democracies internationally did about offensive tweets or posts on social media. A bench of Justices S S Shinde and M S Karnik was listening to the ultimate arguments on a plea filed by Mumbai resident Sunaina Holey, who has been booked by the Azad Maidan police for allegedly posting offensive tweets towards Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray and his son Aditya.
Holey, by her counsel Abhinav Chandrachud, has sought that the FIR towards her be quashed. During the day’s listening to, advocate Chandrachud argued that the info within the FIR towards Holey didn’t reveal any offence, and stated that she had merely posted a video and was not the writer or creator of the identical.
Advocate Chandrachud additional argued that Holey had not referred to any group, caste or faith in her publish and subsequently, the publish didn’t represent any offence. The Maharashtra authorities’s counsel senior advocate Manoj Mohite, nonetheless, advised the court docket that an officer of the Mumbai police’s social media division discovered “something fishy” in Holey’s tweets and therefore an FIR was registered.
At this, the court docket requested what different democracies on the planet did in related circumstances. The court docket stated that the advocates from each side should throw some mild on the stand taken by different democracies, as the identical is perhaps helpful for educational functions too sooner or later.
“In the entire world, how many democratic countries are there like India? In those countries, what is the stand taken on such tweets, WhatsApp messages or any criticism?” the bench requested. “Give details of it if it is possible, for academic interest,” it said.
The arguments will proceed on December 14.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink