[ad_1]
New Delhi:
A Delhi courtroom has dismissed a plea filed by former Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) scholar chief Umar Khalid, who was arrested for his alleged function within the northeast Delhi violence, searching for to fulfill his relations throughout police remand.
Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat mentioned, “In the totality of facts and circumstance of the case, I see no merit in the application, and accordingly, the application is dismissed.”
The courtroom famous that the counsel for the accused had made a selected request for permitting the assembly time of the accused together with his counsel throughout police custody remand and the identical was allowed for daily for 30 minutes throughout your entire custody remand.
“There was also an apprehension of safety raised by the counsel for the accused and thus a specific direction was also given to the concerned Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) to ensure the safety of the accused,” the courtroom noticed.
Umar Khalid, who has been charged below the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) within the case, was final week despatched to 10-day police remand by a Karkardooma courtroom in Delhi. His police custody will finish on September 24, when he shall be produced earlier than the courtroom.
Umar Khalid’s counsel had, throughout the listening to, mentioned that verbal assurance was given on the time of remand by the police that his household can be allowed to fulfill throughout the police remand, nonetheless, they aren’t being permitted to fulfill with the accused.
He additional acknowledged that police custody is very lengthy and thus accused shouldn’t be disadvantaged of assembly together with his household or associates. It is prayed that the applicant be permitted to fulfill his household on a minimum of two days for a interval of 30 minutes every day, the counsel sought.
The counsel had argued that the interval for assembly together with his household could also be interchanged partially together with his assembly time. It is additional submitted that there isn’t any provision barring the accused to fulfill together with his household, he added.
Special public prosecutor Amit Prasad had opposed the plea saying that there isn’t any provision within the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for permitting conferences with the household of the accused throughout his custody and added that assembly with the counsel has already been allowed.
Mr Prasad submitted that the current utility might not be allowed because the accused is already assembly together with his counsel and if the accused has to convey any message to his relations, he can convey that by means of his counsel.
The violence, which came about within the northeast space of the nationwide capital between teams supporting and opposing the Citizenship Amendment Act in February this yr, led to the deaths of a minimum of 53 folks and injuring a whole lot of others.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink