[ad_1]
EVEN because the Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to lift the interim keep on Maratha reservation, the aggrieved community blamed the state authorities for “poor strategy which has led to the present situation.”
A five-member Constitution bench on Wednesday refused to vacate the interim keep, and determined to hear the petitions difficult the constitutionality of the Maharashtra Socially and Educationally Backward Classes (SEBC) Act, 2018, enacted by the Maharashtra authorities.
Vinod Patil, one of the respondents within the case, mentioned the bench refused to move an order to lift the keep granted by a three-judge bench in September this 12 months. “The bench heard the arguments made by the government lawyers as well as my lawer. The court said it appreciated the points made for lifting the stay but since the matter is serious, it will conduct final hearings from January 25.”
According to Patil, the Supreme Court mentioned each side shall be allowed to submit their arguments until January 18, after which the ultimate hearings shall be carried out from January 25.
Also Read| Maharashtra OBC ministers need caste-based survey, proportionate funds outlays
During Wednesday’s listening to, the Maharashtra authorities was represented by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, P S Patwalia and Kapil Sibal. Senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Sandeep Joshi represented Vinod Patil.
Patil mentioned after the Supreme Court refused to lift the keep, the attorneys pleaded that because the choice course of for some college students underneath the Act had been accomplished, it ought to be allowed. “However, the court rejected the plea,” he mentioned.
Criticising the state authorities, Patil mentioned, “It was a big disappointment for Maratha community today. However, the community should remain patient. The Maratha community is united and organised, but the government should not test the patience of the community. We had earlier said that while fighting a case in the court, it needed a different strategy. This has been consistently missing right from the beginning. If the state government had taken the necessary steps earlier, we wouldn’t have faced such an embarrassing situation today.”
Referring to the arguments made by the state authorities’s attorneys, Patil mentioned,”There was no want to point out the supernumerary idea for giving reservation to Maratha community. Yet, the attorneys raised this level. In flip, the courtroom requested whether or not the state authorities has enough funds to implement the idea. I feel the arguments ought to have been restricted to getting the keep lifted quite than telling the courtroom that there are different alternate options accessible. In such a state of affairs, why would the courtroom lift the keep when different choices can be found for the community or have been deliberate by the state authorities?”
Patil mentioned although the courtroom didn’t lift the keep, the judges didn’t sound adverse in regards to the reservation problem. “The judges accepted the points made by our lawyers. They said the points were good but this matter cannot be decided immediately…,” he mentioned.
“Nothing is lost yet. The government needs to act decisive to give justice to students. There are several alternatives available to ensure justice to Maratha students….At the same time, we request political parties like the Congress, NCP, Shiv Sena and the BJP to take the reservation issue seriously,” mentioned Patil.
Stating that the Maratha community has full religion within the Supreme Court, Patil mentioned,”We will take recommendation from authorized consultants and strongly place our arguments earlier than the courtroom. We will battle until the top to give justice to the Maratha community.”
Rajendra Kondhare, coordinator of the Maratha Kranti Morcha, mentioned, “Today’s development is disheartening. While many communities, without any recommendation, are enjoying reservation, Maratha community is being deprived of the benefits of reservation despite the Backward Class Commission recommending reservation for the community.”
Kondhare mentioned if the supernumerary idea is carried out, there is no such thing as a want for the federal government to go earlier than the Supreme Court. “That the SC has not objected to supernumerary concept is a welcome development. The state government should implement it immediately as it resolves this longstanding issue,” he mentioned.
Rajya Sabha MP Sambhijiraje Chhatrapati, who’s main the community’s battle for reservation, mentioned, “The lawyers presented the arguments in a proper way today. However, there was no need for them to seek postponement of the hearing. This is what I object to. Because of this, the hearing got posted to a later date.”
Sambhijaraje mentioned one other constructive consequence was that the apex courtroom didn’t oppose the supernumerary idea. “The court merely asked whether the government has money… it, however, did not object to the concept. I will write to Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray about implementing the supernumerary concept,” he mentioned, including that he may even meet the chief minister on this connection.
Meanwhile, state BJP chief Chandrakant Patil mentioned, “The SC lifting the stay is a failure of the Uddhav Thackeray government and it is a big blow to the Maratha community.”
© The Indian Express (P) Ltd
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink