[ad_1]
Allahabad High Court (File picture)
Stating that it doesn’t see a Hindu and a Muslim in a pair, the Allahabad excessive court docket stated that the contempt of an individual’s alternative is in opposition to the suitable to freedom. The court docket made it clear that no individual or household might intervene of their peaceable life. Even the state can not object to the connection of two adults, stated the HC.
- Information18.com
- Last Updated: November 24, 2020, 10:41 IST
- FOLLOW US ON:
Amidst row over inter-faith marriages, the Allahabad High Court in a key verdict has stated two adults have the suitable to select their life companion. The court docket stated that the legislation permits two adults to reside collectively, whether or not they’re of the identical or reverse intercourse. The court docket made it clear that no individual or household might intervene of their peaceable life. Even the state can not object to the connection of two adults, stated the court docket.
The HC’s judgment got here on the petition filed by Salamat Ansari and three others residing in Vishnupura police station space of Kushinagar. It’s alleged that Salamat and Priyanka Kharwar married in opposition to the need of the household. Both of them received married on August 19, 2019 as per Muslim rituals. After marriage, Priyanka Kharwar grew to become Alia. Priyanka’s father has filed an FIR within the case, alleging kidnapping of their daughter below the POCSO Act.
On behalf of Salamat and three others, a petition was filed within the High Court demanding the cancellation of the FIR and safety. The court docket discovered that there is no such thing as a dispute in regards to the age of Priyanka Kharwar aka Alia as she is 21 years previous. The court docket has allowed her to reside along with her husband. The court docket stated that the POCSO Act doesn’t apply on this case. The court docket has additionally quashed the FIR lodged in opposition to the petitioners.
At the identical time, taking into the suitable of a father to meet his daughter, the High Court stated Priyanka Kharwar or Alia has the liberty to meet whoever she desires to. However, the HC additionally hoped that the daughter would behave with all due etiquette and respect for the household. Her father stated that non secular conversion for marriage is prohibited. Such marriage isn’t legitimate within the eyes of legislation, he acknowledged.
On this, the court docket stated that the contempt of an individual’s alternative is in opposition to the suitable to freedom of alternative. The court docket stated that it doesn’t see Priyanka Kharwar and Salamat as Hindus and Muslims.
The court docket stated that Article 21 of the Constitution provides freedom to reside peacefully with an individual by his alternative and need. It can’t be interfered with. This order has been given by the Division of Justice Pankaj Naqvi and Justice Vivek Agarwal.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink