[ad_1]
File picture of the Supreme Court of India.
The apex court docket, which refused to settle for the request of Bahadur’s counsel to adjourn the listening to, noticed that whether or not his nomination was rightly or wrongly rejected relies upon on his eligibility.
- PTI New Delhi
- Last Updated: November 18, 2020, 14:01 IST
- FOLLOW US ON:
The Supreme Court Wednesday reserved order on sacked BSF Jawan Tej Bahadur’s plea difficult the Allahabad High Court verdict which had dismissed his election petition towards the ballot panel’s determination to reject his nomination papers to contest towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi from Varanasi constituency within the 2019 Lok Sabha polls. The apex court docket, which refused to settle for the request of Bahadur’s counsel to adjourn the listening to, noticed that whether or not his nomination was rightly or wrongly rejected relies upon on his eligibility.
Why ought to we grant you liberty for adjournment. You are abusing the method of legislation. You argue, a bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde instructed Bahadur’s counsel. The counsel argued that Bahadur had earlier filed his nomination as an impartial candidate and later as a candidate of the Samajwadi Party.
The Returning Officer on May 1 final yr had rejected the nomination papers of Bahadur, a Samajwadi Party candidate, who was dismissed from BSF in 2017 after he posted a video on-line complaining in regards to the high quality of meals served to the troops. While rejecting the nomination papers of Bahadur, the Returning Officer had noticed that “the nomination paper is not accompanied by certificate issued in the prescribed manner by the Election Commission to the effect that he has not been dismissed for corruption or disloyalty to the state”.
.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink