[ad_1]
New Delhi:
The Delhi High Court on Monday mentioned a sufferer of objectionable on-line content material can’t be anticipated to maintain on on the lookout for recent hyperlinks and make complaints every time and a everlasting answer needs to be discovered to this drawback.
The remark by Justice Navin Chawla got here in the course of the listening to of a person’s plea claiming that his late spouse’s {photograph} was being wrongly depicted on social media platforms because the sufferer of Uttar Pradesh’s Hathras rape case.
The counsel showing for the person informed the courtroom that whereas the sooner hyperlinks despatched by him to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY) have been eliminated/blocked, he lately discovered 80 extra recent hyperlinks.
The lawyer mentioned his consumer can’t be anticipated to maintain on the lookout for hyperlinks eternally after which make complaints every time to the ministry and the social media platforms, like Facebook, Google and Twitter, ought to watch and take away such content material or hyperlinks themselves.
Taking observe of the submission, the courtroom mentioned “a victim cannot go on searching for links and making complaints. There has to be some other solution.”
Facebook, represented by senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, informed the courtroom that it can not monitor and take away content material or hyperlinks by itself.
He mentioned that Facebook wants an order from MEITY, the courts or investigating companies like police to take away or block such content material.
Mr Rohatgi, nonetheless, agreed with the courtroom {that a} sufferer can’t be anticipated to maintain monitoring for the objectionable content material.
The courtroom, thereafter, directed Facebook, Google and Twitter to dam or take away, as quickly as attainable, the hyperlinks which present the petitioner’s spouse because the Hathras alleged rape sufferer.
The courtroom mentioned that if the social media platforms have objections to removing of any hyperlink, the identical be communicated to it by the use of an affidavit.
The man, in his plea, has contended that the {photograph} of his spouse is being circulated on numerous social media platforms wrongly depicting her because the sufferer of the unlucky incident of alleged rape and homicide of a younger woman at Hathras, Uttar Pradesh.
He has additionally argued that even in any other case, revelation of the identification of the rape sufferer is an offence beneath the Indian Penal Code, although within the current matter picture of a unsuitable particular person is in circulation.
A 19-year-old Dalit girl was allegedly raped by 4 upper-caste males in Hathras on September 14. She died on September 29 at Delhi’s Safdarjung Hospital throughout therapy.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink