[ad_1]
The Congress on Wednesday levelled cash laundering costs in opposition to a firm linked to Uttarakhand Chief Minister Trivendra Singh Rawat’s Industrial Adviser Okay S Panwar, saying the CM’s declare of zero tolerance to corruption is not more than a slogan. Moving a discover for the suspension of the scheduled enterprise of the Uttarakhand Assembly on the third day of its winter session to debate the problem, Congress MLA Kaji Nijamuddin claimed the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had written to the state authorities in June concerning the agency’s involvement in “illegal activities”.
It was alleged within the discover that Panwar had give up because the director of Social Mutual Benefit Company Ltd after turning into the chief minister’s Industrial advisor and it’s now being run by his spouse and brother. Levelling cash laundering costs of value over Rs 200 crore in opposition to the agency, Nijamudding mentioned the matter is of quick public significance and deserves to be debated within the House by placing apart the scheduled enterprise of the day.
Participating within the admissibility of the discover, state Congress president and Chakrata MLA Pritam Singh mentioned the chief minister’s so-called zero tolerance to corruption ought to start together with his personal industrial adviser. “How come an amount of Rs 200 crore was transacted by the firm within just three years,” he requested. Referring to the NH-74 rip-off by which a CBI probe is but to be launched regardless of the chief minister’s assertions to the opposite, Singh mentioned it’s a basic case of corruption flourishing proper below the nostril of the CM.
“How ironical does it look when juxtaposed with all the drum beating being done by the state government about zero tolerance to corruption,” he mentioned. “It proves that zero tolerance to corruption is no more than a slogan. The state government does not have the true will to fight corruption, he said.
Ranikhet MLA Karan Mahra said there are 2.5 lakh shareholders of the company whose credentials need to be looked into as their residential addresses are not mentioned in its records. Leader of Opposition Indira Hridayesh said the lack of will on part of the government to combat corruption is also reflected in its failure to create the post of a Lokayukta.
The delay in it is deliberate as all ministers, including the chief minister, will come under its ambit, Hridayesh said. Replying to the allegations, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Madan Kaushik said he had sought information from the RBI regarding the firm and it has clearly stated that it has forwarded nothing about the company to the government in June.
On its credentials, Kaushik said a probe conducted by the STF in 2019 had listed it among 98 firms having the approvals of the regulatory bodies concerned. After Kaushik’s assertions, Kaji Nijamudding termed it as a clear case of money laundering and said he could submit a pen drive containing data substantiating his charges, triggering a brief but heated exchange between the treasury and opposition benches.
Kaushik said he did not need to see any pen drive when he had documents from the RBI and the STF to rebut the charges. Speaker Premchand Aggrawal intervened on it, saying the opposition’s charges had been rebutted point-wise and there is no point in stretching the discussion.
At this, angry opposition members rose from their seats, shouting anti-government slogans like “bhrashtachari sarkar nahin chalegi”. When the speaker ignored them and went forward with the day’s enterprise, the opposition walked out of the House.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink
